The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1980 to 2010 in a particular country. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the percentage of recycle of various materials in a particular country from 1980 to 2010.
Paper and cardboard materials have the highest recycling percentage over the 22-year period. From 1982 to 1990, the percentage goes up from 65 to 80, but after 1990, there is a fall in the recycling rate, reaching 70% in 2010.
A moderate rise in recycling percentage can be observed for glass containers. Despite the fall in the initial years, a gradual increase is visible after 1990 for this category.
The most significant change is associated with the recycling of aluminium cans. The recycling rate consistently rises from nearly zero percentage to 45 % over the period considered.
Plastics recycled in the least proportion, level crossing 10%. In 1982, no plastic materials were recycled. However, from 1996 to 2010, we can see a slow increase up to 10%.
In general, except paper and cardboard, all other materials have an increasing recycling percentage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25316455696 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84388022963 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4964389776 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4545454545 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3636363636 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195525916807 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826281745578 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859082560539 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120250783652 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103326382279 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.