The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates rates for population with 65 years old or more in USA, Sweden and Japan since 1940 to 2040.
Overall, at the beginning of the period, less than 10% of the population of the three countries aged 65 or over. However, the projection to end of the period demonstrate a raising in the population over 65 years old in all the countries mentioned.
By 1940, the 5% of the population of Japan aged 65 or more, this was the lower rate of the three counties for the same year. Since that year – 1940- to around 1990, the old population moderately decreased. Despite this, in 2000,the rate become to grow graduatelly until reach a 10% by the year 2030. The last decade of the period, the old population will abruptly climb outracing the USA and Sweden’s rates with more than 25% of the population with 65 years old or more.
Looking the USA and Sweden percentagewise, at the beginning of the graph each one had almost 10% and 7% ,respectively, of old population. In that moment, each country increased their rates constantly until 1980 where both experimented a modestly downward trend. Although, around 2025, USA as Sweden will suffer a steadly rise in their old population until reach a 22% in USA and 25% in Sweden of people older than 65 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hree countries aged 65 or over. However, the projection to end of the period demo...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the graph each one had almost 10% and 7% ,respectively, of old population. In that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70535714286 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71522540125 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8858698948 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150527122312 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776937117097 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555373666452 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113987820937 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393078169369 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.