The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates how many commodities delivered using four various transport in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002. Overall, the most popular goods transport during reported year was road, while the least used transport modes was pipeline.

Moving to the detail, the highest number of commodities transported during the initial year was using road (70 millions of tonnes). The figure rose gradually in the following years, to reach the highest number at the end of period (97 million tonnes). There were two varieties of goods transport (water and railroad) showed similar trend (approximately 40 millions of tonnes) in 1974. In contrast, the smallest number of goods was transported using pipeline (around 5 millions of tonnes).

water, however, transported approximately the same amount of goods for more than a decade. The number fell to around 50 million tonnes in 1998, and then climbs to more than 60 millions of tonnes in the final years. Furthermore, railroad witnessed moderate change from 1978 to 1994, then it climb to the initial figure in 2002. finally, the number of goods transported using pipeline increased more than 4 times at the end of the period (20 million of tonnes).

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 million'.
Suggestion: 70 million
... during the initial year was using road 70 millions of tonnes. The figure rose gradually in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 million'.
Suggestion: 40 million
...road showed similar trend approximately 40 millions of tonnes in 1974. In contrast, the smalle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...s was transported using pipeline around 5 millions of tonnes. water, however, transported ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
...ipeline around 5 millions of tonnes. water, however, transported approximately the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '60 million'.
Suggestion: 60 million
...s in 1998, and then climbs to more than 60 millions of tonnes in the final years. Furthermore,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'climbs'?
Suggestion: climbs
...erate change from 1978 to 1994, then it climb to the initial figure in 2002. finally,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...it climb to the initial figure in 2002. finally, the number of goods transported using ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62069642861 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 12.7236001195 43.030603864 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176563349821 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829530910216 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590576093191 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139623891652 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597430923527 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.