The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four modes of transport.
The line graph compares the amount of goods transported in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002 using different means of transportation. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
Overall, the quantity of products transported in the UK over the period by all means of transport increased except for rail. It is also noticeable that road was the primary means of transporting goods while the least used was through a pipe.
In 1974, the amount of goods transported on road was at around 70 million tonnes and this figure slightly fluctuated before climbing up to nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002. Goods shipped through pipeline began at approximately 5 million tonnes then rose gradually for the next years to peak at just over 20 million tonnes in 1995, after which it levels off until the final year.
With regard to the figure of goods hauled in water, it started at just under 40 million tonnes but rose by nearly 50% between 1978 and 1982. The number remained relatively constant until it dropped to almost 50 million tonnes in 1998, then subsequently went up to just over 60 million tonnes in 2002. Rails' figure fell from 40 million tonnes in 1974 to roughly 30 million tonnes in 1994, before increasing to its original number in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transporting goods while the least used was through a pipe. In 1974, the amou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, except for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8064516129 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50028773642 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5017065743 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199061072281 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999938196601 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091817704819 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150210104093 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764044109419 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.