The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
The given line graph provides information about the changes in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks consumed by the urban dwellers of the US from 1978 to 2009. The graph also mentioned the general trend in the consumer Index price during this period.
The figures for all categories remained almost below 70 in 1978, but by the end of 2009 the price of fresh fruits and vegetables showed a dramatic increase despite of some fluctuations and reached the zenith at above 300. Similarly, even though there was a gradual hike in the price of sugars, sweets and carbonated drinks, it always remained below 200 compared to the fresh fruits and vegetables over a period of 30 years. However, the consumer price-index showed a slow and steady increase during the period and fluctuated approximately between 70 and 225.
Overall, the demand for fresh fruits and vegetables surged among the city people compared to the other categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsumer Index price during this period. The figures for all categories remained ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mer Index price during this period. The figures for all categories remained alm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, similarly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08024691358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5927175161 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1910239873 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444727550659 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189833736818 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128998650017 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256885076392 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112392405324 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.