The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009.
The line graph illustrates changes in price of three different food product groups from 1979 to 2009 and and the overall trend in the consumer price index over this 30-year period.
Overall, although prices for the three food product groups showed a fluctuating leapforg, only the increase in the prices for fresh fruits and vegetables was significantly higher than the rise in the general consumer price index.
In 1979, prices have the same starting figure for fresh fruits and vegetables and carbonated drinks. The former then took the lead by increasing constantly and sharly when they reached a peak of 340 in the first half of 2009. However, they lost momentum and decreased merely by 10 in the remainder of 2009. By contrast, prices for carbonated drinks rose steadily during the period of the survey. At the end of the survey, they hold the lowest point among all the factors surveyed (at 152), making them become the least favoured food product group.
The consumer price index and the number for sugar and sweets shared a striking similarity. From the same figure of about 60 at the start of the period, both figures then experienced a slight increase. After many minor fluctuations, the consumer price index finished at 220, which was 20 higher than its counterpart-prices for sugar and sweets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...t food product groups from 1979 to 2009 and and the overall trend in the consumer price...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96803652968 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56266512822 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7648299449 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325859969386 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129796327122 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104832196134 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190228827702 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035493173312 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.