The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
the line graph compares acid rain emissions divided into 4 categories which is transport and communication, electricity and water supply, domestic also other industries in British from 1990 to 2007.
Overall, it is clearly to see that both experienced upward trend over the given period.
On the one hand, there was a dramatically decrease of 2 millions tonnes in electricity and water supply which led to a significantly fall to almost 0.5 millions tonnes from 1999 to 2007 whereas transport and communication increased steadily by nearly 0.5 millions tonnes but later leveled out moderately to almost 0.3 millions tonnes. It is easily to seen that electricity and water supply was deceased sharply in the figure while transport and communication witnessed a contrasting movement in the chart.
On the other hand, there was a similar downward trend in domestic also other industries over the given period. For instance, other industries dropped gradually from 2 millions tonnes to around 1.5 millions tonnes. In addition, domestic decreased steadily from 0.5 millions tonnes to almost 1 millions tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph compares acid rain emissions...
^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...en period. On the one hand, there was a dramatically decrease of 2 millions tonnes in electricity and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...ectricity and water supply which led to a significantly fall to almost 0.5 millions tonnes from 1999...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36781609195 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91908766517 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1842131918 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188745742987 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917401253641 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805212489572 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107852347695 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676186590088 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.