The line graph illustrates the average cost of cell phone services and residential phone services in the USA, from 2001-2010.
An overall view shows that the average costs of cell phone services experienced an upward trend, while the residential phone services experienced a downward trend. However, in 2006 both services cost $550.
In the first stage, in 2001, the amount of money spent by Americans on residential phone services was around $700, while the cell phone services were accounted at $200. It is noticed that within one year only, the cell phone services cost increased almost by $100 and on the other hand the residential phone services decreased by the same amount.
Reaching 2006, the meeting point, there was a significant rise in the cost of the cell phone services until it reached almost $750. As for the residential services, it showed a remarkable fall, after 2006, reaching almost $400 in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the average c...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e services in the USA, from 2001-2010. An overall view shows that the average c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03289473684 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58852109939 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7362223204 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4076559465 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217619679229 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129533904625 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294951675636 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114540140069 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.