The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart shows how many tickets were sold to sports events, theme parks and movies in 2009 with a table to show the various prices for each event.

An overall view, the chart shows that the most popular form of entertainment in 2009, and the cheapest was the cinema. It shows 1,050,000 admissions for the cinema compared to the theme park with 370,000 admissions and 170,000 admissions for the sports events.

Now, the prices table shows that the most expensive ticket was for football games and the cheapest, as mentioned, was for cinema. Single admission for a football game was at $71--$75 and $298 for the family ticket (consisting of 4 people), whereas the cinema's single admission was at $15 and $55 for the family ticket. Basketball and cricket games cost less, at $34 and $24 respectively, for a single admission. As far as the theme park single admission, it was at $70 (a little less than the football games) and $210 for the family ticket, which is a significant reduction.

To sum it up, the cinema, as shown, was the most popular and affordable entertainment option among the three.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart shows how many tickets wer...
^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...art shows how many tickets were sold to sports events, theme parks and movies in 2009 ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71727748691 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59514806016 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4716829839 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846475448815 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465228062672 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224077763083 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576655352412 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220891862202 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.