The graph depicts about the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The illustration depicts about the number of people that were imprisoned in five different countries between 1930 and 1980.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of incarcerated criminals in the Great Britain, the United States and New Zealand after five decades increased while in countries like Australia and Canada, the number of outlaws that were locked up decreased.
Apparently, the imprisonment figures in the United States, the Great Britain and New Zealand rose from 1930 to 1980. America started with 100 thousand felons who were jailed in 1930 but this up surged by approximately 20 thousand after 10 years. Although, it fell slightly by 10 to 20 thousand between 1950 and 1970, the number of prisoners in the United Stated peaked at 140 thousand in 1980. Furthermore, the Great Britain which started with only 30 thousand showed an increasing trend until it reached roughly 85 thousand in the last year. In addition, New Zealand has 100 thousand prisoners in 1930, however, it decreased to almost half between 1940 and 1950 but it regained its momentum and rose to almost 90 thousand in 1980.
On the contrary, the three remaining nations showed a decline in the number of people who were confined inside the prison after 50 years. In 1930, Australia has 70 thousand prisoners. Though this figure went up by approximately 30 thousand in 1970, this number plummeted by 30 thousand after 10 years. Meanwhile, Canada has 120 thousand outlaws who were jailed in the start of the period but it reduced by 20 thousand after five decades.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96923076923 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60547897901 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484615384615 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5686541696 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195515345303 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101868418254 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138832439671 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187007705859 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187256782681 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.