The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The graph illustrate the amount of carbon dioxide per person, which was emitted by the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, although, the United Kingdom, decreased the average carbon dioxide emissions per person continually, it had the highest share of emitting. In addition, Italy and Portugal released carbon dioxide increasingly.
In 1967, the United Kingdom by emitting more than 10 metric tonnes carbon dioxide per person averagely. By passing the time the UK was able to reduce this amount to 8 metric tonnes in 2007, nevertheless, throughout the described interval, the United Kingdom was the first country. Trend of average carbon dioxide emission in Sweden had a different behavior, first of the all from 1967 to 1977, with a stunning rise, it reached at 10 metric tonnes and then, reduced to less than 6 metric tonnes.
On the other hand, Italy and Portugal evacuated 4.5 and 1.5 metric tonnes carbon dioxide per person respectively, while both countries, increased the emission of carbon dioxide per person and in 2007, Italy emitted 6 and Portugal released 8 metric tonnes carbon dioxide per person. in fact, in 2007 Sweden released the latest amount of carbon dioxide per person.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The graph illustrate the amount of carbon dioxide per person...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...etric tonnes carbon dioxide per person. in fact, in 2007 Sweden released the lates...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st amount of carbon dioxide per person.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in addition, in fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.543496609 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.570334046 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32437524559 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181856124841 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760038597366 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241792820748 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572835223586 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.