The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie chart compares the total cost spending on different areas of particular school in the UK in three years 1981, 1991 and 2001. The numbers are expressed in per cent.
As is observed, the teacher salaries had the highest amount among all of other investigated issue. While, insurance cost had always the minimum amount over these years.
The percentage of teacher salaries was increased from 40 in 1981 to 50 in 1991. While, in 2001, their salaries experienced a slight decrease and reached to 45 per cent. Meanwhile, other worker salaries gradually declined during these years 28, 22 and 15 per cent in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
Spending money on furniture and equipment was 15 and this amount slowed down to 5percent. A huge tendency to increase the cost of equipping school was showed in 2001 and reached to 23 percent. smallest costs allocated to the insurance issues. Its percentage slowly rose 2 , 3 and 8 per cent in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... among all of other investigated issue. While, insurance cost had always the minimum ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Smallest
...owed in 2001 and reached to 23 percent. smallest costs allocated to the insurance issues...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the smallest'.
Suggestion: the smallest
...owed in 2001 and reached to 23 percent. smallest costs allocated to the insurance issues...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nce issues. Its percentage slowly rose 2 , 3 and 8 per cent in 1981, 1991 and 2001...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89221556886 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65979530311 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6650649818 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2727272727 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190762295609 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710360366856 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994417461133 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131111784237 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114084885003 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.