The graph shows the changes in percentages of various digital devices users in one European city to browse the Internet and send emails between 2000 and 2008. Describe the trend and changes in the chart.
The graph illustrates the changes in percentages of people using digital devices in one European city for browsing online and email purpose from 2000 to 2008.
The chart shows a distinct trend between percentages of smartphones users and the others. While desktops, laptops and tablets users all decrease, smartphones users increase dramatically from 5% to 40%. This clearly shows a change in user's digital devices preferences.
There's a similarity between percentages of desktops and laptops users. Both of them go down from 2000 to 2008. However, desktops users drop more dramatically in comparison with laptop users, from 40% to 20%. The trend for laptop users decline more gradually than desktops users.
The figure of tablets users is different from the other trends since it fluctuates over the period. The percentage goes up to 30% in 2004 then decline to 20% in 2008.
Overall, the chart shows a distinct trend among four different digital devices users percentages, with smartphones being the most used and downward trend for the rest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...n users digital devices preferences. Theres a similarity between percentages of des...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ds since it fluctuates over the period. The percentage goes up to 30% in 2004 then ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66873192772 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6207697163 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8181818182 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389231717288 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150474289195 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125246429337 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224437405668 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131064478916 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.