The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.
The line graph illustrates the information about three different capital cities were hosted international conferences over
a period 20 years.
Overall, it is clear that there was so much changes between 3 cities during the time shown. The international conferences organizing in city A and B were constant decline. By contrast, this case in city C quite common, especially at the end of the term.
In 1980, city A and B started with the respective number of international conferences 35 and 30. Over next 10 years, this figure saw a sight drop and continuously decrease into around 25 times in both cities at the end of the time.
In 1980, no international conferences hosting in city C. But there was a significant increase in 1990 with 20 times be hosted. And this number reached a peak of 35 times in 2000. And finally, it went minimal down in 2010 but still higher than in city A and B
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 78
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese island 73
- The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1890 and 2000. 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time .Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages ? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re hosted international conferences over a period 20 years. Overall, it is clear...
^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... Overall, it is clear that there was so much changes between 3 cities during the tim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66455696203 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90291142276 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7923600978 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364114437051 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145126154101 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14137681057 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243430698729 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137930023573 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.