The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.

Essay topics:

The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.

The line graph illustrates all the data with regards to international conferences in City A, City B and City C for over 30 years of period.

Overall, there was a significantly increased in City C with a steady decreased. While, City A and B had dropped trend on the first year and steadily increase to the last year of international conferences..

In 2000, City C had its peaked to 35 information of international conference and decreased to 30 in 2010. While, City A has a slight decreased in 1985 international conference and it slightly goes up to around 32 over 5 years of periods. From around 32 it goes down to approximately over 25 in 2000 and it decrease to below 25 data on the last year of international conferences.

In contrast, there was a gradual decrease of the data in 1980-1985 for about 20. While, there was a sudden increase in 1990 for like over 25 information in the international conference and with a minimal decrease for below 25. In 2005, it had seen to goes up for approximately 27 information of international conferences up until 2010, respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e last year of international conferences.. In 2000, City C had its peaked to 35...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...to approximately over 25 in 2000 and it decrease to below 25 data on the last year of in...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75132275132 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32266707001 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449735449735 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6178421778 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287611369178 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135365910353 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779243431567 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184370639858 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541982192949 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.