The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010.
The line chart illustrates the number of international conferences held in three different cities from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable from the graph that there was a downward trend in the number of conferences in city A and B while city C saw a rapid increase in this figure.
At the beginning of the given time, there was no international conference took place in 1980 in cities C. This was followed by a period of exponential growth from 1985 to 2000, with the quantity of conferences reaching a peak of 40 in 2000. However, the next 10 years of the period brought a sustained decline in this figure.
Decreasing from exactly 35 in 1980 to 29 in 1985, the number of international conferences in cities A then slightly rose to 32 in 1990. The latter period from 1995 to 2010 witnessed a gradual dip in this figure. Meanwhile, 30 international conferences were organized in cities B in 1980, the number then dropped sharply to 21 in 1985, before fluctuated at somewhere between 24 and 26 conferences prior to 2000. After that, the figure continued to increase to 27 in 2005 and then slipped back to 26 at the end of the 20-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ganized in cities B in 1980, the number then dropped sharply to 21 in 1985, before f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61463414634 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87128597753 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4417343166 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280811613085 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128932011255 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107899160204 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204038697083 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804952816328 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.