The graph shows the information the populations of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007.
The column chart illustrates the information about that the compare the estimated population of nine Asian countries(Vietnam, India, Malay, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and China) from 1994 to 2007.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that one of the country in Cambodia where population of elephants had increased as compared to others eight Asian countries the number of elephants were showed to downward trend, over given period of time.
To commence with, India was the highest where population of elephants in 1994 reached to peak point approximately 10000 while, in this year others two nations in Myanmar and Thailand but, Myanmar was the second largest and the figure for elephants population at more than 5000 whereas, the populations of Asian elephants in Thailand was slightly fell down under 4000, respectively. Subsequently, others six nations where the number of elephants were showed to remained stable nearby 3000.
However, in 2004 the populations of elephants in China at less than as compared to others eight countries which account for 500. Whereas, four Asian nations( Vietnam, Malaysia, srilanka and Thailand) where the proportion of the elephants were represented to remained stable just above 3000. Finally, the figure for elephants in India and Myanmar in 2004 minimally dropped to 7200 and 4800.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...re showed to downward trend, over given period of time. To commence with, India was the highe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29107981221 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75721588103 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.3669521571 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329545496038 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140729773638 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675930635432 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200735710163 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403714532212 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.