The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an England town in 2012.
The bar chart depicts how many children, divided by gender, played six kinds of sport (tennis, badminton, cycling, swimming, football, and hockey) in a town in England in 2002.
In general, while football was the most popular sport for boys, the majority of girls preferred swimming. Besides, there were four sports in which boys participated more than girls.
It is clear, first, that while 60 boys played football, the number of girls who took this sport as leisure was considerably lower (around 20). Regarding tennis, the figure for boys who played that sport was 50 as opposed to just under 40 for girls. Similarly, more boys (approximately 35) cycled than girls (20). Strikingly, both males and females lest interested in playing hockey although the difference was minimal with about five more boys who played that sport than girls.
On the other hand, more girls took part in two remaining sports which both showed the differences of 10 between the genders. For example, as many as 40 girls preferred badminton in comparison to 50 girls for swimming.
To sum up, the number of boys playing sport exceeded that of girls in the given year.
- Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can only be brought about governments and large institutions. How far do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. 84
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 84
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cycled' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cycles'.
Suggestion: cycles
.... Similarly, more boys approximately 35 cycled than girls 20. Strikingly, both males a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, for example, in general, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95336787565 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45768505808 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569948186528 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8888562091 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346974724357 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147222699025 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661378721224 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200907314781 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069097000432 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.