The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002. It includes those with a degree, whose with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other qualifications.
The graph depicts the amount of money that people earned per week in three degrees, namely first degree, higher degree, and other qualifications. In general, although the amount of money which people received weekly varies according to the age groups, there are two trends visible.
The first key feature shows that people who had the first degree of education earned the least amount of money throughout. To specify, increasing significantly from around $370 at ages 21-25 to nearly $200 at ages 36-45, the amount of money that people with first degree received per week fell slightly to around $690 at ages 56-60. Similarly, that of people who had a higher degree follows a similar trend and rose steadily from approximately $390 (ages 21-25) to around $750 (ages 41-45). After that, although there was a small fall, this number climbed to a peak of about $790 as the highest level at ages 56-60.
On the other hand, in other qualifications, there was a fluctuation in the amount of money that people earned weekly. For example, beginning with about $420 at ages $21-25 as the highest level, the amount of money that people who had other qualifications increased significantly to a peak of over $800 at ages 36-40, followed by a consistent decrease to just below $700 at ages 56-60. Strikingly, only at 46-50 and 51-55 age groups, people with a higher degree and people who had other degrees received the same amount of money per week.
To sum up, people of all type of qualifications earned more money when they were at old ages than at the beginning of the work ages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, for example, in general, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74538745387 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58064729708 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461254612546 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.936261159 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217997940877 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11063516594 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605303026994 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143523916793 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649708600737 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.