The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph depicts the change in the gap between the amount of energy production and consumption in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also provides the estimation for the trend up to 2025.
Starting at the same point, nearly 25 units, in 1950, both production and consumption increased continuously to just over 65 units in the first 25 years. Although consumption was always higher than production during this period, the difference was negligible. However, the gap between the two figures was extended during the next 25 years, so the US needed to import energy to bridge this gap. To be more precise, while production went up gradually to reach 75 units in 2000, growth in consumption was more rapid, reaching 95 units in 2000. Strikingly, only in the mid-period did both consumption and production witnessed fluctuations in their figures strongly.
As far as the predictions are concerned, this trend is likely to continue up to 2025 with the gap between production and consumption widening. By 2025, it is expected that consumption will reach 140 units, whereas the US will be able to produce only 90 units. So, more energy has to be imported to give to consumers.
To sum up, the US production is not keeping up with US consumption so that the imports will continue to need in the next 25 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82589285714 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79139973277 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.20129262 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23901270933 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101278149436 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060740422947 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170000590842 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822270728154 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.