The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the total visitors to an island in the Caribbean, as well as where they stayed, from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of tourists increased significantly over the period. In addition, the number of visitors staying on cruise liners witnessed a dramatic rise, overtaking those staying on the island, which underwent a more moderate increase.
There were about 750 thousand visitors staying on the island at the beginning of the period, approximately 500 thousand above those staying on cruise ships. During the next three years, the figure for the former doubled (to 1.5 million), while vacationers on cruise liners fluctuated between approximately 250 thousand and 500 thousand. From 2013 to 2015, those staying on the island plateaued at 1.5 million and then fluctuated at this level until the end of time surveyed. In the meantime, cruise ships passengers rose steadily, surpassing the former midway through 2015 and reaching 2 million in 2017.
As a result of the growth in the two sectors, total visits started at 1 million in 2010, and grew consistently through to 2015, before experiencing a brief plateau at around 2.7 million through 2016. In 2017, it increased sharply to 3.5 million, which was over triple the immediate amount.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18357487923 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70866769353 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6340402781 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12550452608 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584974437134 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553429117451 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975004810359 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649582487234 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.