The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012.
As illustrated by the vertical chart information about the percentage of men and women Academic Staff members across the faculties in a major University in 2012. The data is calibrated in per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that in terms of Arts female Academic Staff was about 55 % on this as opposed to the male it had showed 42 %. similarly, the male was higher percentage in business than the female around 62% and 38% respectively. In education, percentage of female had been showed a great rise of 70% whereas, male had been showed 20% approximately.
As far as trend was concerned the percentage of male was higher in engineering than remaining faculties. while, female had showed a low percentage which was 19% axproximately. Moreover, female percentage in law, medicine and Science was 40, 50 and 38% respectively.
Overall,it is evident that maximum percantage was from male in engenering in the year 2012 whereas,least was from female which is also in engeneering faculties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | rm21co | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Bao Linh Le | 92 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | arfaat | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Rajansidhu | 91 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Rajansidhu | 67 | view |
- Nowadays many business meetings and trainings are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 78
- There is less social contact between young and old what are the reasons what measures can be taken 76
- Some people think that keeping pets is a good for children.while other think that it is dangerous and unhealthy for children. which opinion do you agree with?discuss both option and give your opinion? 56
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 78
- Some people think that government should Ban dangerous sports. while other think that people should have freedom to do any sports or activities. discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...opposed to the male it had showed 42 %. similarly, the male was higher percentage in busi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise of 70% whereas, male had been showed 20% approximately. As far as trend was ...
^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ale had been showed 20% approximately. As far as trend was concerned the percenta...
^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...n engineering than remaining faculties. while, female had showed a low percentage whi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n engineering than remaining faculties. while, female had showed a low percentage whi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...as 40, 50 and 38% respectively. Overall,it is evident that maximum percantage was ...
^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , least
...e in engenering in the year 2012 whereas,least was from female which is also in engene...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15474048747 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1121636502 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38925369273 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139481045523 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124255893638 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220283218756 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104043996296 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.