The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
The given bar chart depicts the information about the academic staff members across the seven faculities of a major university during the year 2012 by the both: male and female. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall,it is evident that, the maximum percentage of male was in the case of: science, engineering, law, and business whilst, minimum was in the section of: arts, education, and medicine.
It can be clearly seen that, in the case of, engineering the percentage of faculity by the male was 82 percent which had been approximately 60 percent more than female percentage. In addition to this, in the medicine section percentage of both male and female was approximately same: 59 percent ,and 58 percent. Morevoer, the percentage of female in education was 78 percent which had been huge more than the percentage of male which was just 20 percent.
As far as trend was concerned, in the faculity of law, the percentage of female had been 40 percent which was 20 percent less than the male. Furthermore, in the sections of science, arts, and business the percentage of both male and female was: 62, 38; 42,58 ,and 63,38 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... is calibrated in per centum. Overall,it is evident that, the maximum percentage...
^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...emale was approximately same: 59 percent ,and 58 percent. Morevoer, the percentage...
^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... both male and female was: 62, 38; 42,58 ,and 63,38 percent respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77843483367 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6038114963 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230111159544 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113989273651 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091143834278 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154097282648 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894041727079 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.