The graph shows the unemployment rates in Brazil and China between 2003 and 2009. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the unemployment rates in Brazil and China between 2003 and 2009. The data consider for every year of month of march for Brazil and China.
In first stage, China unemployment rate in 2003 it was 6.5 percentage and it's slump to 6 percentage in year 2004. It's further plunge to 5.5 percentage by year of 2005. The unemployment rate further remain constant in 2006. In considering between year 2006 and 2007, in starting it slightly reduces and further came to 5.4 percentage by year 2007. In year 2008, unemployment rate slightly increase approximately 5.2 percentage, it's approximately same at the end of year 2009.
In later, Brazil unemployment rate in march 2003 were approximately 3.2 percentage. It were still increase approximately upto 4 percentage by year 2004. In approximately end of year 2004 to year 2006 drastic change from 4 percentage to 5 percentage. There were slight decrease 5.0 percentage to approximately 4.8 percentage. Considering unemployment rate for year 2007 to 2008, it's increase sharply approximately 5.7 percentage. It approximately same by year of 2009.
In considering both country and data from year 2003 to year 2009, unemployment rate decrease from 7.0 percentage which were in 2003 to 5.5 percentage by the year 2009. In opposite Brazil unemployment rate increases from 2.5 percentage which were in 2003 to 5.8 percentage by year of 2009.
In conclusion, percentage of unemployment rate were more for brazil than for china by compairing data from year 2003 to year 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...its slump to 6 percentage in year 2004. Its further plunge to 5.5 percentage by yea...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mately same at the end of year 2009. In later, Brazil unemployment rate in marc...
^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...oximately 3.2 percentage. It were still increase approximately upto 4 percentage by year...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...3 to 5.8 percentage by year of 2009. In conclusion, percentage of unemployment ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16064257028 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14041331214 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.36546184739 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4885708115 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3125 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6875 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193581122242 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112231766203 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131823097265 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176135222554 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926021768432 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.16 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.