The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

Essay topics:

The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

» Write at least 150 words.

The graph illustrates data of computer ownership as a percentages of the population and by distinct level of education in the year from 2002 to 2010.

Overall, it is clearly noticed an increasing trend of computer owner in 2002 and 2010. Meanwhile in context to level of education computer owner percentage increasing sharply from 2002 to 2010.

According to 1st bar graph, there was around 55% of people who owned computer and it rose markedly to exactly 60% in 2002. Moreover it increase slowly and finally reached approximately 69% during 2010.

As concerned to 2nd graph, in 2002, only around 12% of computer were there in no high school diploma which was triple less than student from high school graduate where number was roughly 39%. Whereas in same period the proportion for post-graduate qualifier was higher,that was approximately 72% .likewise bachelor degree qualifier and college incomplete were around 55% and close to 80% respectively. However, it indicates that in 2010, the percentage went up slightly khet was around 81% in college incomplete and close to 90% in bachelor degree.Aditionally post graduate qualifier remain at top in computer ownership with proportion of around 94%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a percentage' or simply 'percentages'?
Suggestion: a percentage; percentages
...lustrates data of computer ownership as a percentages of the population and by distinct level...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...end of computer owner in 2002 and 2010. Meanwhile in context to level of education comput...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...t rose markedly to exactly 60% in 2002. Moreover it increase slowly and finally reached ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...dly to exactly 60% in 2002. Moreover it increase slowly and finally reached approximatel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
...n for post-graduate qualifier was higher,that was approximately 72% .likewise bachelo...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er was higher,that was approximately 72% .likewise bachelor degree qualifier and c...
^^
Line 13, column 550, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Aditionally
...ete and close to 90% in bachelor degree.Aditionally post graduate qualifier remain at top i...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, likewise, moreover, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29533678756 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95661125424 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8271940786 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264576979961 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149243950085 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125277416403 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223561888454 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131592048234 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.