The graphs below show the number of hours people spent on social media per day from 2010 to 2016 as well as the reasons why they used them.
The line graph depicts the number of hours people spent on different social media platforms every day from 2010 till 2016 whereas the pie chart shows the reasons for which they were used.
Overall, it’s clear from the line chart that the use of Snapchat, Instagram and Linkedin has increased over the time period, while Facebook saw a decline in it use. The pie chart make it obvious that the main reason people used social media was to communicate and the least common reason was to watch videos.
The Snapchat appears to be the most popular platform as its daily usage in 2010 was 5 hours which increased further to about 6 hours by 2016. The Instagram saw a significant fluctuation in its usage but ultimately it reached almost 5 hours per day in 2016, which is a 2 folds increase from 2010 levels. The Facebook, after increasing in popularity till 2014, saw a sharp decline afterwards to about 4 hours per day.
The main reason behind social media use was communication, which accounts for 58% of total use. The second most common reason to hop on social media applications was shopping at 23% while games and videos collectively accounted for less than 20% of total utility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eased further to about 6 hours by 2016. The Instagram saw a significant fluctuation...
^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is a 2 folds increase from 2010 levels. The Facebook, after increasing in popularit...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...afterwards to about 4 hours per day. The main reason behind social media use was...
^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n, which accounts for 58% of total use. The second most common reason to hop on soc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7729468599 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45128979848 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5216474805 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379998822844 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166622200391 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109477406523 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235386781583 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117632541115 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.