The graphs compared Japan and Malaysia in terms of five categories of average family expenses in 2010
The given pie chart illustrates spendings of average household in Japan and Malaysa in 2010 divided into five categories: housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services.
The smallest portion of expences in Japan were health care bills in 2010 making up only six per cent. Then, bigger fraction were spent on transportation and accomodation with one fifth and twenty one per cent respectively. The two major sources of spendings were food comprising approximaly one quarter of all incomes and other goods and services with twenty nine per cent of total family budgets.
As well as in Japan, the malaysian minor group of expences was health care with only three per cent, which is twice less than in previously discussed country, followed by transportation expences with one tenth in 2010. However, unlike Japan, other goods and services accounted for about one quarter of entire household budget being the third biggest presented group. Food constituded twenty seven per cent, whereas housing was the major category of spendings providing more than a third.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...ion and accomodation with one fifth and twenty one per cent respectively. The two major so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-nine
...comes and other goods and services with twenty nine per cent of total family budgets. As...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-seven
...ggest presented group. Food constituded twenty seven per cent, whereas housing was the major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26589595376 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62673359127 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4233951054 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115010874827 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574939492485 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449343855903 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930653810662 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413739679349 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.