The graph below shows the population figures for different type of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012.
The presented line graph provides the amount of four kinds of turtles in India between 1980 to 2012 with respect to their population in the beginning of the given period.
The number of olive ridley turtles and all species rose over the given period, whereas the populations of green and leatherback turtles experienced a significant fall.
Between 1980 and 1997 the population of olive ridley turtles increased gradually reaching a peak of about 135 per cent of 1980's population. Then the figures levelled off near to 130 per cent. Meanwhile, the number of all species grew slightly to 115 per cent in 1985. After that, there was a three year period of a sharp fall followed by bouncing up to approximately 110. At the rest of the period the data fluctuated.
The number of green turtles dropped slightly between 1980 and 2001. Then the size of the population remained steady until 2012 at around 90 per cent. The population of leatherback turtles rose sharply until 1987, when it reached its highest number of 110 per cent. After that there was a steep decrease to 55 per cent in 2008, followed by a recovery to 60 per cent in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | KayVu | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | GREgirl | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | jessie_12345 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | vdrobny | 87 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | buimai1412003 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons In other words it is a governmental problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- With a growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people Some people think that genetically modified foods offer a viable solution to this problem Do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71859296482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53288265781 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0442212641 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3636363636 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185991070481 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745909374346 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673376313013 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135411353209 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622802448029 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.