he chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

he chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the percentage of people utilizing multiple social media networking sites in canada between 2014 to 2015.

Overall, throughout 2014-2015 most of canadian people are using one social media sites, while the percentage of canadian people who utilizing five social media sites is the lowest. However, the number of the people who used one site gravitate to decrease significantly, from 36% in 2014 to 28% in 2015. In contrast, in 2015 the number of people who used used five sites had increased 2% than previous year.

On the other hand, the percentage of people who are not utilizing any social media and people who used two social media in 2014 and 2015 relatively in the same level, up to 20% respectively. Furthermore, the number of “no sites” people tend to decrease slightly, while in diverge side the number of people who used two social media sites gravitate to escalate slightly too.

In general, the percentage of people in canada who used more than one social media sites tend to increase significantly. During 2014 to 2015, the number of people who utilized two sites, three sites, four sites, as well as five sites increased by 1%, 4%, 3%, and 2%, respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: used
...trast, in 2015 the number of people who used used five sites had increased 2% than previo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es had increased 2% than previous year. On the other hand, the percentage of peo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in contrast, in general, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66001482233 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440594059406 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1963853454 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26638200828 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167798299053 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425577482367 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214647518164 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391790261792 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.