Jenny is conducting a research project on cell phone use. The chart shows the percentage of students, and parents of students, at Jenny’s school who owned cell phone over a 14 year period. The table provides the cell phone ownership rate nationwide over the same timeframe.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph represents the percentage of students and their parents owning cell phones, at Jenny's school from 2002 to 2016 and the table gives information about the percentage of people owning cell phone nationwide in three different years based on Jenny's survey results.
Overall, cell phone owners were raising every subsequent year. Parents owning cell phones increased consistently as the year pass, nevertheless, there was a noticeable increase has been observed in students owning cellphones. Additionally, the percentage of people owning cellphones also raised rapidly.
On the one hand, parents owning cellphones was around 48% in 2002 increased in a stable way and reached more than 80% in 2016. On the other hand, growth in students owning cell phones vary, although it was 2% in 2002 and increased consistently for 4 years, a considerable increase was seen and by 2012 it reached about 24%. However, Students owning cell phones skyrocketed after 2012 and reached 74% by 2016.
Increase in nationwide cellphone ownership percentage also increased rapidly. Moreover, 60% of people own a cellphone in 2002. Interestingly, only 4% do not own a cell phone by 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a stable way" with adverb for "stable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...phones was around 48% in 2002 increased in a stable way and reached more than 80% in 2016. On t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39037433155 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86240655248 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.9334683825 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32495626916 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150007651739 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10198609492 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237712574667 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829222250365 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.