The line chart shows the number of children participating in three kinds of sports in a club from 2008 to 2014.
The given graph compares the quantity of adolescent involvement in three selected sectors of the sport industry over a six-year period, between 2008 and 2014.
As can be seen from the chart, the number of young athletes in all three activities experienced a certain increase, meanwhile, football has been the dominant during the surveyed period.
In terms of teenaged footballers, the proportion of these people witnessed a slight upward tendency. In detail, the data of those who engaged in playing football commenced standing at eight million children and insignificantly decrease in the next two years. Nevertheless, from 2010 to 2014, the chart depicted a moderate improvement in this data, which peaked at 9 million football players in the final year.
Turning to the 2 rest ones namely muscular sports and swimming, with the similar trend, both of them are also shown to go up. Particularly, the number of applications in swimming sport within 2014 nearly doubled that in 2008 and the amount of those who are into playing athletics also rose by 4 million after six years. In 2014, both these areas of sport swap their position which reached approximately five and four million children respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and four million children respectively
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06632653061 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73942535403 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 196.0 22.4926829268 871% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 993.0 112.824112599 880% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 196.0 22.9334400587 855% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 5.23603664747 630% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237778410443 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237778410443 0.103423049105 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133895764215 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319431209613 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 100.4 13.2329268293 759% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -119.0 61.2550243902 -194% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 78.5 10.3012195122 762% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.31 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.31 8.06136585366 215% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.4 10.9970731707 731% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 11.0658536585 515% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.