The line graph illustrates how teenagers in Australia chose three categories of fast food between 1975 and 2000. Overall, fish and chips witnessed a slight fluctuation before falling whereas pizza and hamburgers increased rapidly throughout the period.
Fish and Chips were eaten at 100 times by Australian teenagers in 1975, which was dramatically higher than the figures of consumption of both pizza and hamburgers in the same year. In the next few years, there was a slight drop in Fish and Chips purchase, which then rose back to nearly 100 times eaten in 1985. In contrast, more teenagers in Australia chose pizza and hamburgers, whose figures climbed considerably from 1975 to 1985.
From 1985 to 2000, a remarkable decline was seen in the number of times fish and chips eaten to just below 40 times in 2000. Conversely, pizza and hamburgers continued to increase from 1985 to 1995, at 100 times and approximately 85 times respectively. Since then, the figures of these types of fast food stabilized until 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03550295858 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7196157179 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4362898366 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259848036985 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126345219148 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114365754307 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185074701968 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044436619422 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.