The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph indicates the percentage of the visitors to England who came to Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton, England in a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the percentage varied among four attractions very much. Most of the changes from 1980 to 2010 changed dramatically, especially Pavillion.
The percentage of tourist who visited Pavillion changed a lot during the period. For example, it increased gradually from 1980 when it peaked at 49% in 1985. Throughout the remainder of the period, the percentage of tourists in this place had decreased rapidly by the year 2000 and continue from that time to 2010. In the same way, the visitors coming to Art Gallery increased to 37% in 1985 but there was a gradual decline between 1990 and 2010 when it dropped to below 10%.
The change of Festival wasn’t like Pavillion and Art Gallery. Although it started higher than both of above destinations, there weren't any clear changes, it always stayed below 30%. The percentage of the tourists at Pier wasn't high, it's quite low when compared with rest of attractions, but at least, the percentage of visitors increase from 1980 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors to England who came to Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton,...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... than both of above destinations, there werent any clear changes, it always stayed bel...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... The percentage of the tourists at Pier wasnt high, its quite low when compared with ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, at least, for example, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9847715736 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67263583339 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8156222762 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145418886171 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627886738707 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621553774808 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988712814789 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357205848531 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.