The line graph provides information about the percentage of visitors in England exploring the four different attractions of Brighton. Overall, the general trend of two lines is slight increased, one of the line is in a steady state and the last is in a gradual fall.
The Pier in 1980 was visited only by 10% of tourist, but the line surged until 2010 where it doubled it rate, with a percentage nearly the 20%. The number of visitor to the other three attraction was similar at the beginning with a fluctuation between 20% and 30%. The Festival maintained its trend with a small decline in 1995 and a final percentage of about 29%. The Pavillion started to rise rapidly from 20% till 1995 when it changed its tendency and began a gentle dip with a final rate of 30%. In the complex also the Pavillion showed a growth in its trend.
The only attraction that suffered a dip in its percentage was the Art Gallery. It started rocketing in 1985 with 38%, but then it was subjected to a rapid dive with a final rate of only 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rates'?
Suggestion: rates
...e surged until 2010 where it doubled it rate, with a percentage nearly the 20%. The ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...with a fluctuation between 20% and 30%. The Festival maintained its trend with a sm...
^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...95 and a final percentage of about 29%. The Pavillion started to rise rapidly from ...
^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Pavillion showed a growth in its trend. The only attraction that suffered a dip ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48404255319 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50754294402 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9876513885 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161931869922 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765240439616 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936910326819 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119654179666 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819718898966 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.