Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It's clear that a very big issue of our society is the division between countries which detain all the richness and others that are very poor. Rich countries want to help the others with money but it does not solve the problem because sometimes the money are stolen by the politicians of the poor countries who use them for their own personal scopes.

In my opinion the Western countries should help second and third world states with other types of helps. In the first place, important factories could be delocalized in poorer countries to help improve their economy and increase the occupational level. In the second place schools should be built to give an instruction to the weaker social brackets to help them to obtain a job in the future. Another important thing that could be maden by developed countries is to finance the construction of important pubblic buildings where people could be recruited.

Someone could say that poorer countries have to become rich with their own forces becuase they are too lazy to work and try to improve themselves. I disagree with these words because we have to remember that the underdevelopment of a lot of countries is a guilt of the western countries which in the past went to Africa or South-East Asia and abuse of gold, petrol, natural gas and other natural richness of those countries.

In conclusion, in my opinion there are a lot of things that developed countries can do to help poorer countries to become richer, not only giving them money.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...my and increase the occupational level. In the second place schools should be buil...
^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldings where people could be recruited. Someone could say that poorer countries ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, third, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the first place, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84046692607 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58103683123 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544747081712 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1312849888 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37611317109 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158173391588 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778941405806 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238145844303 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546671161863 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.