The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian, Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how many students from Iranian, Greek and Turkish signed up for Sheffield University during a period of 4 years, from 2005 to 2009.
In general, the patterns of Iran and Turkey enrolling are quite similar, going up across the four years while the number of students from Greece tends to decrease significantly.
In 2005, there were few Iran and Turkey students enrolling at Sheffield University, about 40 and 20 students respectively. However, the period of four years witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of students from these two areas, which was four time more than the one in 2005. In contrast, the data on Greece students started at a relatively high number, 180 students in 2005, but then fell sharply. Although the drop was slower in 2007, in 2009, the figure of Greece students was just more than 40, the lowest data among three countries at that time.
To sum up, the graph highlights the difference trends in the number of students from Iranian, Greek and Turkish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Iran seems to be countable; consider using: 'few '.
Suggestion: few
...ase significantly. In 2005, there were few Iran and Turkey students enrolling at Sheffi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, in contrast, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5485135892 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9832960705 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249123936705 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131480907954 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641097066351 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162353511622 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574557942773 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.