The map illustrate two proposed sites for a new supermarket in Garlsdon town.
Overall, the first proposed site is on the countryside of the town between railway and road networks, whilst the second site will be on the centre of the town with no traffic network, except for the train.
The town of Garlson has a population of 65.000 people. The majority of the people hails from Cransdon located furthest, 25km from the town centre, on the south-eastern part of the town. Cransdon has both railway and road system as a method of transportation, whilst, another city, Hindon has the least population of 10.000 people and is 12km from the town centre on the north-western side of the town centre and is connected with both road and railway network. The 3rd city is Bransdon with 15.000 people and is linked with roadnetwork only.
In addition, the first proposed site for the supermarket is located on the countryside, north-west from the town centre. It will be constructed between railway and road transport system, close to Hindon city and away from Bransdon and Cransdon, as well as, the southern industry. The second possible site will be on the central part of the town centre and all other amneties. It will be located on the southern side of the railway line and north of southern industry. There are already two existing industries, one on the north and another southwards, both between residental area and the countryside. No traffic is allowed to enter the town centre except the railway which cut through.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn side of the railway line and north of southern industry. There are already two...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, well, except for, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91085271318 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66781850462 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7520339031 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.583333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216839720161 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105983132611 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134087023958 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217154705693 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166643677415 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.