The map shows the changes that have taken place in meadowside village and fonton , a neighbouring town since 1962.

Essay topics: The map shows the changes that have taken place in meadowside village and fonton , a neighbouring town since 1962.

johnmathewg's picture

The three maps illustrates the developments that have occurred in meadowside village and its neighbouring town, Fonton from 1962 till date.

There has been considerable changes in the two areas since 1962. These two places which were smaller in the past have gradually increased in size and are now merged with meadowside village now called meadowside suburb.

The two places were separate entities with different transportation systems in 1962. Meadowside village had two small west and north roads while Fonton on the east, had a rail system that passed within it.

By 1985, the road in meadowside village had been expanded into a main road which passed through the centre of the village. A housing estate and leisure complex were constructed on the Left side of the road and a super store on the opposite side of the road on the southern side of the village. The main road was also extended and connected to Fonton on the east.

Presently, larger buildings have been added to the centre of the two merged areas which have also increased in size. The railroad in Fonton now has a west branch which leads to the station in the centre of the area. The hotel and business bank lies on the north and south of the station respectively.

Votes: 
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1962. Meadowside village had two small west and north roads while Fonton on the...
^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased in size. The railroad in Fonton now has a west branch which leads to the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81775700935 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49004042866 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.939212734 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7272727273 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289727298982 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108751228154 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105077551489 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179869516639 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124476127311 0.0819641961636 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages