The maps
The given maps illustrates the refurbishment of Islip town center from now to the future. Overall, there are a lot of changes taking place to the center while some infrastructure will be maintained.
Firstly, the square of the center will be expanded considerably, include the countryside. Next, the main road is projected to be only for pedestrians while a dual carriageway will be constructed around the center to ensure the traffic flow. Shops which are on the north side of the area will be replaced by bus station, shopping center, car park. Moreover, in this area, new housing will be established and a new route is going to be planned to ensure the transporting of citizen to accommodations. In addition, the park is predicted to be narrowed to give rooms for new housing. Besides, the shops in the south side of the center is going to be maintained as well as school and housing outside the dual carriageway.
To sum up, a great deal of transformation will be made to a bigger Islip center with more facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of an university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be improving existing public transport. 73
- The youngsters outweigh the elders 84
- The maps 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79661016949 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00570281589 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4053557103 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0401204038215 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256408810679 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725233635149 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489178157871 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691802385279 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.