The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012
The maps show the developments of Frenton between 1990 and 2012. At first glance, it is evident that remarkable changes have taken place in Frenton.
It can be seen from the maps that new buildings were built. In the southwest of the maps, the area of trees in 1990 was replaced by a modern technopark and in the north of Frenton, blocks of flats were built to provide more accommodations for citizens. Besides that, old houses in the east of Frenton in 1990 became new blocks of flats.
Some buildings also were made to serve for demand of residents. For example, the bank became a restaurant; theater and shops were replaced by a cinema and a supermarket respectively. Cafe and park were improved to become hotel and golf course. Moreover, the hospital was made bigger to satisfy demand of people
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e changes have taken place in Frenton. It can be seen from the maps that new bu...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in 1990 became new blocks of flats. Some buildings also were made to serve f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 669.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77857142857 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61013526899 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9257080604 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207331044311 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868231748684 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104343553643 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157807347666 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125245783409 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.