The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now. Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant
The maps compare the layouts of a book store in the year 2000 and now. Generally, the store’s transformation centralizes around the relocation of books for various genres and the installment of a new seating area and a café.
In 2000, visitors of the store after entering were met by a section displaying travel book and to the right of it, another section for new arrivals while he service desk could be found at the corner to the right of the entrance. Until now, these areas have been kept unchanged.
By contrast, the most striking rearrangement could be seen in that for fiction. This used to occupy large spaces, spanning one long section to the left of the entrance and a shorter one at the back of the store. The size for fiction area, however, has been reduced significantly, as the genre now shares space with art, hobbies, and cookery books, which used to be placed on three separate shelves at the center of the room. Thus, the center of the store is now filled with 3 sets of tables and chairs. Lastly, non-fiction work has also been reallocated, taking up the area at the back while its past position has been converted into a café.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66504854369 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57107469957 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4648658313 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115904643965 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614854145806 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740258673442 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992675339653 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573910036585 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.