The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table illustrates forest areas in six regions of the world over a 15-year period. These areas are measured in millions of hectares.
The most prominent trend is for forested land to shrink over the examined period, except for Asia and Europe, where the reversed is true. Also, Oceania stands out for having substantially less forested land than other regions.
In detail, the forest area in South America recorded a significant drop, from 946 to 882, which is similar the reduction seen in Africa (from 749 to 691). A less marked decreases in forested land, were also witnessed in North America, dipping to 705 in 2005. The figure for Oceania, which was home to the smallest area of forest as well, experienced a negligible decline by 2.
By contrast, Asia and Europe followed the opposite pattern. While the land with forest in Asia has a net increase of 8 from 1990 to 2005, with a small drop of 6 in the interim, that in Europe increases continuously, from 989 to slightly over 1000. It should be noted that Europe accommodates largest areas of forest in all three years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decrease'?
Suggestion: decrease
...n Africa from 749 to 691. A less marked decreases in forested land, were also witnessed ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... less marked decreases in forested land, were also witnessed in North America, di...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 1990 to 2005, with a small drop of 6 in the interim, that in Europe increases...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accommodates the largest'.
Suggestion: accommodates the largest
...er 1000. It should be noted that Europe accommodates largest areas of forest in all three years. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... areas of forest in all three years.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81914893617 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54166280145 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632978723404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6280691148 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114962138584 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480602843526 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262749103363 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736795886644 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198459616154 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.