The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given layout plans illustrate the changes to Colwick Arts Centre between 2005 and today.
It can be seen that there are many changes during the period, including new buildings and recreation facilities.
First, there were two galleries located in the right side of the area with two separate buildings, whereas now the concert hall is there as it was expanded. The Gallery was moved towards the left of the Art Centre. The concert hall and cinema building was demolished; however, in their place the authorities placed a central exhibition area and also constructed two additional building next to each other for a cinema and a drama studio. What is more, the meeting room was relocated to the left of the drama studio as two separate small rooms instead of one large.
When it comes to places for general purposes, the information desk was remained the same location. In addition to that Wasteland area was developed a new recreation area with a stage, trees and outdoor exhibition and performance area. Finally, the toilet was moved to the right side of the area, and it was also decreased in size.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, so, whereas, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8835978836 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53919748454 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5573565721 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0550510384219 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336669453159 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680493261307 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054015445141 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575096074765 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.