The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.

The maps give information about the concept of nature Museum from 2010 to 2013.
It is clear that, the nature Museum witness radical change with the most noticeable being the mammals and ice age in the entrance.
The nature Museum was designed i 2010 and included mammals, ocean hall, dinosaurs, table ticket, lobby, entrance. The reception directly accessible nature Museum and next to is the table ticket. Look at the map in 2010, the nature Museum have the ice age replaced to mammals located convenient way for people, the ocean hall at the top.
While the entrance remain in the bottom, it is become noticeable narrower and go to the next to entrance we will see table ticket and lobby below the ocean hall. Meanwhile, compared in the present, today nature Museum have few places( 10 area), the ocean hall, ice age and insect, dinosaurs, lobby, table ticket, mammals, human, shops, cafe. Besides, the hotel in the present don’t have area for visitors or shops. Now this place has expanded to new places. Mammals, human, shops, cafe are all gathered in one place. . Finally, place for human on the left side. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. So, it can be seen that the nature Museum in 2013 is modern than in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ps, cafe are all gathered in one place. . Finally, place for human on the left si...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85135135135 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31714063941 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59009009009 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2311195166 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8461538462 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274129614813 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1082726632 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139753704931 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175426911018 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807851982457 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ps, cafe are all gathered in one place. . Finally, place for human on the left si...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85135135135 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31714063941 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59009009009 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2311195166 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8461538462 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274129614813 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1082726632 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139753704931 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175426911018 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807851982457 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.