The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.https://blogchiasekienthuc.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/map_1.jpg

Essay topics:

The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

https://blogchiasekienthuc.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/map_1.jpg

The diagram shows the development between Stokeford 1930 and Stokeford 2010 area.

Overall, it is noticeable that the gardens were narrowed, and the number of the house was expanded, while farmland disappeared.

in 1930, the number of houses ran along both sides of the road in Stokeford. In 2010, the main road opened more road in Stokeford 2010 than Stokeford 1930, and houses on both sides of the road widened and along ran through from north to south. The shops were demolished. The primary school was extended. However, the gardens and large house areas were decreased in size. Besides, the large house in 1930 was modernization to the retirement home. The farmland in the south road and east which were vanished in Stokeford 2010.

The post office in Stokeford 1930 which was remained until 2010. Additional, the bridge and the size of river stoke which were not changed from 1930 to 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...xpanded, while farmland disappeared. in 1930, the number of houses ran along bo...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich were not changed from 1930 to 2010.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96710526316 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42875455413 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5107698033 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6363636364 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8181818182 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133801015635 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579183253378 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563330584399 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963655185785 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642017034904 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.