The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
Sports ----- boys 6-11---- boys 12-16
football 87 78
basketball 35 25
cricket 45 34
rugby 23 21
swimming 19 19
The table shows the percentage of male students aged 6-11 and 12-16 who played football, basketball, cricket, rugby and swimming in 2010 in England.
As an overall, the younger group had higher number of boys who participated in those sports than the older group. Additionally, it is clear from the table that football was played the most in both age groups.
The proportion of football players of the 6-11-group accounted for 87%, which was the highest number. Meanwhile. the figure stood at 78% for the 12-16 group. 35% was the percentage of the boys aged 6-11 who joined in basketball while the other group had smaller proportion, about a quarter. Cricket had the second highest figure in both groups, which were 45% and 34% respectively.
The percentage of students who were interested in playing rugby of the 6-11 group was 23% whereas the other boys who played this sport had a smaller proportion at about 21%. Swimming was the sport which had the least number of students participated in, accounted for just 19% same for 2 groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... for 87%, which was the highest number. Meanwhile. the figure stood at 78% for the 12-16 ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hich was the highest number. Meanwhile. the figure stood at 78% for the 12-16 group...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89830508475 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59386646801 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0072302937 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283698315376 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120014452335 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733084577143 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182019874104 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229564738007 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.