Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart compares the rate of population who digested the recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in UK from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, most women had more interest in fruit and vegetable than that of men while the percentage of children witnessed the least favor in this type of food.
A glance at the bar chart for more detail, we can see that the proportion of female accounted for 25% in 2002, which was 3% higher than that of male . The percentage of women consumed fruits and vegetable experienced a slight increase to 26% ( in 2010) after reaching its peak at 32% in 2006. In the meantime, we can see that the level of men had a tendency to eat less fruits and vegetable than women, it constituted of 26% and 24% in 2006 and 2010 respectively.
In the converse pattern, children took up a lowest percentage amongst people consuming fruits and vegetable, at 11% in 2002. It then climbed considerably to 18% in 2006 and declined to 16% at the end of survey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...2, which was 3% higher than that of male . The percentage of women consumed fruits...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble experienced a slight increase to 26% in 2010 after reaching its peak at 32% i...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fruits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the level of men had a tendency to eat less fruits and vegetable than women, it con...
^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... the converse pattern, children took up a lowest percentage amongst people consum...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55428571429 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63037500665 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7396700104 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398834574323 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172626516195 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122229155355 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229745492898 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108743548228 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.