Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar graphs illustrate the percentage of having of fruits and vegetables in a day to day activity of the Men, Women and children of the UK in the year 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Overall, the number of consumption of fruits and vegetables by women is more throughout the period when compared to men and children. In the first two years, we are able to see the graph in an upward trend of men, women and children but in the last year, there is a downward trend.
On the one hand, the number of fruits and vegetable were having more by women in 2002 with the percentage of 25 and men were slightly behind them with by only 3% while children were intaking only 11%. In 2006, it is accounted for the largest number of consumption for all the types while women and children consumed 7% more than the previous year however, men were rose to 26%.
On the other hand, despite there is an increase in 2002. However in 2010, we are able to see that women plummeted to 26%. Similarly, both men and children were slightly sluggish by 2% and it is accounted for 24% and 16% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...see the graph in an upward trend of men, women and children but in the last year,...
^^
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
..., despite there is an increase in 2002. However in 2010, we are able to see that women ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, similarly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41370565728 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2664946997 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167484936309 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806264854892 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834616001668 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124782033522 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938366025698 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.