Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar graph indicates that the proportion of healthy food like fruits and vegetables were intake by the UK people on a daily basis in the year 2002,2006 and 2010.
Overall, women consumed more number of fruit and vegetable than the men and children throughout the period. There is a fluctuation in the consumption of fruits and vegetables.
On the one hand, the number of percentage of fruits and vegetables consumed by the female was almost a quarter in 2002 and women dominates the whole period in taking nutrients foods. However, men intake 22% of the fruits and vegetable and it only 3% under women while least consumed by the children with just over one in ten. In 2006, women and children both were rose up to 7% than in 2002 with 32% and 18% respectively where men increased by 4% only.
On the other hand, despite increases in the consumption the year 2006 but in 2010 experienced a slight fall in consumption. In 2010, men and children both decreased by 2% when compared to 2006. The 6% fall observed in the women consumption with 26% still it is in the top position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and vegetables. On the one hand, the number of percentage of fruits and v...
^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riod in taking nutrients foods. However, men intake 22% of the fruits and vegetab...
^^
Line 13, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...served in the women consumption with 26% still it is in the top position.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66839378238 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62032769157 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1093294044 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316472697723 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126081870724 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921412026222 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199391158794 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914393030599 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.