The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The recycling process of wasted glass bottles is depicted by the picture.
Overall, the process consists of three stages, starting from the wasted bottles collected by the collectors to the selling process in the market.
At the first stage of the process, the bottles are gathered up and moved to a warehouse, before they are transported using a lorry box. After that, at the second phase of the recycling process, the bottles are sterilized by filling the high-water pressure, and then, they are sorted based on the colour which commonly no colour, green and brown. Following this, they are sent to the factory and crushing to the tiny pieces glass. Next, the pieces of glass moved to incineration with the heat 600 – 800 degree Celsius for the burning process. After that, a similar process applied to both recycle glass liquid and new glass liquid. The liquid is poured into the mould for the bottle shaping process. Lastly, at the last phase, the bottle filled with the beverages liquid and the company logos is stamped outside the bottles, before it is transported to the market to be sold to the consumers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86387434555 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39397011211 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7003941982 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15950340984 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806319385706 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614089515141 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147237001278 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558297094066 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.